GolfGearReview.com - Golf Club, Equipment, and Course Reviews
Top Posters (30 Days)
Aimee 47
golfpsu 43
srushing 39
Klun 9
rustylinx 9
DON 8
ChrisB 8
Bill H. 8
fjjra 8
DocT 7
Buster 7
nosnowgolf 6
mikelike 4
gtknoles 4
Wayne 3
golfer200 3
mcmullenp4 2
MikeD 1
leslie 1
dmband8985 1
jimk7525 1
MortgageGuy 1
AdmiralXizor 1
avi8torny 1
Site News
Course Reviews
(This Month)

DIVOT27
Buster8
35


Gear Reviews
(This Month)

golfpsu2
cnacho142
DON1
5


Latest Feature
Ping's G15 driver: New look, great results - Don’t be misled by the fact that many times you’ll see the words “maximum forgiveness” associated with Ping’s new G15 driver.

You might get the impression that maximum forgiveness means the c...
Advertisers
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#11565 - 07/04/06 01:23 AM Prototype BiMatrix vs Prototype Comp NT
Ridger Offline
Hacker

Registered: 05/30/06
Posts: 11
Loc: Moscow, Russia
Grafalloy's Prototype BiMatrix vs Prototype Comp NT shafts.
Who used this shafts and what think about it?

Top
#11566 - 07/05/06 09:32 AM Re: Prototype BiMatrix vs Prototype Comp NT
mr_divots Offline
Hogan
*****

Registered: 12/01/04
Posts: 2342
Loc: St. Paul, MN
I have used both. Hated the Bi-Matrix. It was VERY soft to flex. I consulted with Grafalloy prior to purchasing and they assured me the Bi-Matrix was true to flex, if not slightly stiffer than their other offerings. Couldn't have been further from the truth. I felt it actually increased my spin, but that could be due to the fact it was way too soft for me.

The Comp NT is the better of the two in my opinion. I have one in 85 grams in a driver. In retrospect, I think it would have made a better 3 wood shaft, but it's dispersion is very tight. Not the smoothest feeling shaft I've ever hit. Smoother than the Blue however.

Given my experience with Grafalloy and their customer service recently, I'm kinda down on them right now.
_________________________


Top
#11567 - 07/06/06 03:22 PM Re: Prototype BiMatrix vs Prototype Comp NT
Ridger Offline
Hacker

Registered: 05/30/06
Posts: 11
Loc: Moscow, Russia
Thank you for reply mr.Divots!!
OK, as I understood, Bi-Matrix need get with maximal flex.
But is really this shaft very improve game with little loft clubheads for beginners like write in description?
And else: is Comp NT similar Bi-Matrix by softness or it have normal flex? Whats about feelings of both shafts and why Comp NT is more better for 3wood than for driver-what is reason?

Top
#11568 - 07/06/06 03:27 PM Prototype BiMatrix & Comp NT vs UST Pro force V2
Ridger Offline
Hacker

Registered: 05/30/06
Posts: 11
Loc: Moscow, Russia
What you think about UST Pro force V2?
May it be the good choice for Cleveland Hibore?

Top
#11569 - 07/07/06 10:39 AM Re: Prototype BiMatrix vs Prototype Comp NT
mr_divots Offline
Hogan
*****

Registered: 12/01/04
Posts: 2342
Loc: St. Paul, MN
Ridger,
The Comp NT is an excellent shaft and plays true to flex, unlike the Bi-Matrix. The Comp NT shaft I have in my driver is an 85 gram, and launches a little lower than I expected. They also sell a 65 gram, and in retrospect, I probably should have gone with the 65 gram Comp NT for the driver. Given fairway woods have more loft, the 85 would make a good fw wood shaft. That's what I meant.

I have two drivers with the UST V2 75 stiff. Very good shaft. Mid/high launch. Very stable. The 65 gram version I understand launches higher, so if you need a higher launch, that might be the way to go. Also, the Grafalloy Prolaunch launches quite high, so keep that one in mind as well.

The Hi-Bore is a very cool driver. The V2 would work very well in it I'm sure.
_________________________


Top


Moderator:  Aimee, ChrisB, laney, srushing 
Golf Gear Review
GolfGearReview.com's Facebook Page



DicksSportingGoods.com
Forum Stats
1635 Members
13 Forums
3149 Topics
31793 Posts

Max Online: 253 @ 01/23/07 06:01 PM
Who's Online
0 registered (), 3 Guests and 3 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
nothreeputts, MortgageGuy, cnacho14, mcmullenp4, mikelike
1635 Registered Users