Course Reviews (This Month)
Gear Reviews (This Month)
Latest Feature Ping's G15 driver: New look, great results - Don’t be misled by the fact that many times you’ll see the words “maximum forgiveness” associated with Ping’s new G15 driver.
You might get the impression that maximum forgiveness means the c...
|
|
|
#3101 - 11/09/04 10:41 AM
Cavity-back VS Muscle-back
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Cavity back irons are all the rage these days, and for good reason. They make learning the game of golf a lot easier and more fun. But, are they really a good choice for someone that wants to really learn to play golf at a high level of skill? To be honest, I'm not sure it wouldn't be better for a player to start with a muscle-back iron and learn to hit good shots and develope his skills right from the beginning with an iron that forces you to make solid contact or pay the price. The truth is, you can make a fair swing and hit a good shot with a cavity back iron and not even know it wasn't that good of a swing. With a muscle-back iron, you get what you put into it. I fair swing will only give you a fair shot, nothing more, and maybe a lot less. So, how do you learn to make solid contact with the ball if you never really know when you make a bad swing and mishit the ball, if the ball flys at the target on bad swings? On the other hand, with a muscle-back iron, you make a bad swing and you get punished for it and you start to learn the difference between a good golf shot and a poor one. The point I am trying to make is this; How can you learn to play good golf if you have no idea what a good shot realy is? If the forgiveness of the club lets you get away with bad technique, how do you learn good technique? How do you raise your skill level, if you don't even know you are doing a rotten job, because the tool you are using lets you get away with it? The cavity-back irons may make learning the game easier and more fun, but do you learn the skills needed to play top quality golf, as well as the player that uses a muscle back design? Can the new clubs be hurting your game developement? What do all of you out there think? Can a club be too forgiving? What's your opinion and point of view on this matter? For the record, I'm playing a set of Callaway X-16 clones that I love. But is my golf game really as good as I think it is, or am I getting away with murder because I'm playing a cavity back design? Your input will be appreciated.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3103 - 11/09/04 01:29 PM
Re: Cavity-back VS Muscle-back
|
Amateur
Registered: 06/02/04
Posts: 43
Loc: South Africa
|
It has been my experience that if you are not hitting the ball solidly then you will be found out in the wind. A pure shot is not really affected by the wind while a shot that is not pure is "eaten" up by the wind.
I have played muscle back irons for the last 8 years and while I really had to concentrate at the beginning I now would not change them for anything.
Sometimes when I go to the range with friends who play with cavity back irons they have a go with my muscle back irons and struggle to hit even one shot that goes decently. My thinking is this is because they are not used to having to find the centre of the club so when they have to...they can't.
When the wind blows hard, I only lose about 2 or 3 shots verses a still day. My cavity back friends will lose about 15 shots.
That has been my experience.
Bartman
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3104 - 11/10/04 11:25 AM
Re: Cavity-back VS Muscle-back
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Thanks for the feedback on your muscle back irons. I will have to make it a point to check my shots on a windy day a see what happens. Good to know. And I'm not surprized about your friends not being able to play your irons. That is about what I would expect. I bet that you on the other hand could get used to their cavity back irons in a short period of time and play quite well with them. It's like riding a bike and riding a uni-cycle. Any one that can ride a uni-cycle can ride a bike, but a bike rider that gets on a uni-cycle will soon find his butt in the dirt. I fully expect my new forged irons will force me to re-learn my game from the ground up. Thanks for your input. Don
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3106 - 11/12/04 12:13 PM
Re: Cavity-back VS Muscle-back
|
Amateur
Registered: 06/02/04
Posts: 43
Loc: South Africa
|
I think that is about right. You don't want to scare off a guy just learning the game.
That said, I started out as a youngster hitting my gran's blades (they ony had blades in those days) and when I started I could hit a 3 wood about 90 yards, I then progressed until I could hit an 8 iron 90 yards (all with my gran's clubs). I then got my first set of clubs (age about 12 years) and these were cavity backs. I played those until I was about 20. I was playing off something like a 8 handicap when I changed to muscle backs. It took some getting used to but after a few weeks I was hitting it at least as pure as my old cavity backs and then after a month or so I felt really at home with them.
I think it may be that because I grew up playing "steak knife" blades...Jennette Budd I think was the name, that later in life I gravitated back to them.
I don't know what would have happened if I had grown up in this day and age, in those days there was only one type of iron and you just got out there and hit it. No blaming your irons as everyone had basically the same clubs.
In some ways...maybe it was easier back then.
Bartman
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3108 - 12/22/04 04:51 PM
Re: Cavity-back VS Muscle-back
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Good input, thanks for the loan of your knowledge. I'm thinking that if I can learn to hit my new muscle-back irons pretty well, my old cavity back irons will be that much easier to hit well. Thanks again for your help.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3109 - 12/22/04 05:42 PM
Re: Cavity-back VS Muscle-back
|
Pro
Registered: 11/22/04
Posts: 75
Loc: mn
|
I have a question. I am a 19 year old 1 handicap and I am currently playing adams gt irons which are cavity backs that are suppose to be extremely forgiving club. I got the irons about 6 years ago when I didnt hit quite as many solid shots as I do now. I dont have any complaints with irons, but I was wondering if a muscle back iron would help my game to get even better. I am not that interested in any particular iron but if these irons would help to improve my game then I would definelty look into them
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3110 - 12/22/04 08:37 PM
Re: Cavity-back VS Muscle-back
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Hi Reiny; The main reason to go to a muscle back design would be so you can work the ball easier. If your game is at the point where you want to be able to work the ball left to right or right to left, you should look into either a blade or a half blade style set of irons. The first set that comes to mind is the Mizuno MP30's or the Snake Eyes 600C irons. Both set are a half cavity design so you still get a fair amount of foregiveness at the same time being able to work the ball at will. Both sets are also forged irons. As was mentioned earlier, the blade style will force you to make good swings, and that might force you to improve your game some. If you learn to hit great shots with the blades, you should have no problems hitting great shots with the cavity back design. Once you master the muscle back irons, your short game should improve also. Better control is one of the other reasons to use this design, at least that's what they say. I hope this helps.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
1635 Members
13 Forums
3148 Topics
31797 Posts
Max Online: 253 @ 01/23/07 06:01 PM
|
|
|
1 registered (DocMiami),
9
Guests and
1
Spider online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|